![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
England and Wales High Court (Senior Courts Costs Office) Decisions |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Senior Courts Costs Office) Decisions >> Reid v Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2015] EWHC B21 (Costs) (28 October 2015) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Costs/2015/B21.html Cite as: [2015] EWHC B21 (Costs) |
[New search]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable PDF version]
[Help]
SENIOR COURTS COSTS OFFICE
Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
![]() | Claimant |
|
- and - |
||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Defendant |
____________________
Digital Transcript of WordWave International Ltd trading as DTI____________________
MR SHARPLES for and on behalf of the Defendant
____________________
VERSION
OF JUDGMENT
Crown Copyright ©
a. I award a sum equivalent to ten per cent of the costs assessed. That is a figure of £13,000-odd.
b. I award interest on the costs assessed at eight per cent from the day of the judgment, the day of the award for costs. That was 7 January 2015.
c. I order the Defendant to pay the Claimant’s costs of detailed assessment up to 27 July 2015 on the standard basis.
d. I order the Defendant to pay the Claimant’s costs of detailed assessment from 27 July on the indemnity basis.
e. Lastly, I want to award interest on item (i) and on the costs of assessment (items three and four) at eight per cent starting from today.
“As we have already stated, the fundamental question is whether it has been shown by the unsuccessful party that the successful party unreasonably refused to agree to mediation.”