BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
England and Wales High Court (Queen's Bench Division) Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Queen's Bench Division) Decisions >> Nursing and Midwifery Council v Harrold [2016] EWHC 1078 (QB) (09 May 2016) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2016/1078.html Cite as: [2016] IRLR 497, [2016] EWHC 1078 (QB) |
[New search] [Context] [View without highlighting] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
NURSING AND MIDWIFERY COUNCIL |
Claimant |
|
- and - |
||
MRS A M HARROLD |
Defendant |
____________________
Ms Daniella Gilbert (direct access) for the Defendant
Hearing dates: 6 – 7 April 2016
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Mrs Justice Elisabeth Laing DBE:
Introduction
The facts
The first, second, and third claims
(i) The ET's decision
(ii) The appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal ('the EAT')
(iii) The applications to the Court of Appeal
The fourth claim
The ET's decision
The application for a review of the ET's decision
The fifth claim
The sixth claim
The county court claim against the police and the Trust
The NMC removes the Defendant from its register
The seventh and eighth claims
(i) The Judgment on liability
(ii) The decision on remedy
(iii) The Trust's appeal and applications for a review
The ninth claim
(i) The substantive decision
(ii) The Decision on the review application
The Bristol county court claim
The letter of 9 November 2011 from the Trust to the NMC
The tenth claim
(i) The substantive decision
(ii) The applications for costs
(iii) The application for a review of the decision
(iv) The application for the review of the decision on costs
(v) The Defendant's further submissions
(vi) The appeal
The eleventh and twelfth claims
(i) The claims and the applications to amend them
(ii) The decision of the ET
(ii) The application for reconsideration
(iii) The appeal
(iv) Costs
The thirteenth claim
(i) The claim and proposed amendment
(ii) The ET's decision
(iii) The application for a review
The fourteenth claim
The fifteenth claim
The injunction in this case
The law
Discussion
(i) Were any of the claims or applications TWM?
Should the court make a GCRO?
Conclusion
A practical suggestion