0  

    BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE]

    European Court of Human Rights

    PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW


    To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.


    Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.


    Thank you for your support!


    You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> CHENTIEV AND IBRAGIMOV v. SLOVAKIA - 65916/10 (Communicated Case) [2012] ECHR 1358 (03 July 2012)
    URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/1358.html
    Cite as: [2012] ECHR 1358

    [New search] [Contents list] [Context] [View without highlighting] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


    THIRD SECTION

    Application no. 65916/10
    Anzor Chadidovich CHENTIEV and Ali Nurdinovich IBRAGIMOV
    against Slovakia
    lodged on 15 November 2010

     

    QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES

     

     


    1.  In the light of the guarantees issued by the Russian Federation and having regard to the risk which the applicants allege to face, would their extradition be contrary to their rights under Article 3 of the Convention? In particular, do the guarantees offered reliably protect the applicants from treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention given that the charges against them are based on statements allegedly extracted under torture?

     


    2.  If extradited, would the applicants be at real risk of a flagrant denial of justice, contrary to Article 6 of the Convention, arising, in particular, from the use of evidence obtained by treatment contrary to Article 3 (see also the recapitulation of the relevant principles in Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139/09, §§ 258-267, 17 January 2012)?

     


    3.  Does the fact that proceedings concerning the applicants asylum requests are currently pending constitute a sufficient guarantee that they will not be extradited prior to the outcome of those proceedings and, as the case might be, any ensuing proceedings which the applicants may initiate before the Constitutional Court?

     


BAILII:
Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: https://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/1358.html