![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions >> Budzik v Regional Court of Tarnow, Poland [2015] EWHC 2856 (Admin) (12 October 2015) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2015/2856.html Cite as: [2015] EWHC 2856 (Admin) |
[New search]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
In the matter of an appeal under s.26 of the Extradition Act 2003
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
GRZEGORZ ![]() ![]() |
Appellant |
|
- and - |
||
REGIONAL COURT OF TARNOW, POLAND |
Respondent |
____________________
Julia Farrant (instructed by CPS Extradition Unit) for the Respondent
Hearing dates: 5 October 2015
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Mr Justice Supperstone :
"A subsidiary issue, but related, is what the position would be if Anna was not entitled to live in the United Kingdom but required to return to Poland. Would she then be able to receive Gilenya? This is not a matter on which there was evidence before the District Judge. It may be that Gilenya is available but only on a private basis in Poland. It may be that there would then be an issue as to whether she would be able to afford it or whether, in practical terms, it would not be available then to her."