![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
England and Wales High Court (King's Bench Division) Decisions |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (King's Bench Division) Decisions >> Dulieu v White & Sons [1901] EWHC KB 1 (05 June 1901) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1901/1.html Cite as: [1901] 2 KB 669, [1901] EWHC KB 1 |
[New search] [Printable version] [Buy ICLR report: [1901] 2 KB 669] [Help]
Divisional Court
King's Bench
B e f o r e :
____________________
DULIEU v. WHITE & SONS. |
____________________
G. Spencer Bower ,instructed by William Hurd & Son for the defendants.
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Kennedy J.:-
Phillimore J. :-
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Note 1 Shearman and Eedfield, Negligence, cited in Beven, Negligence in Law, 2nd ed. p. 7. [Back] Note 2 The Law of Torts, by Sir P. Pollock, 6th ed. pp. 166, 167. [Back] Note 4 Beven, Negligence in Law, 2nd ed. p. 77. [Back] Note 5 (1896) 151 N. Y. 107. [Back] Note 6 151 N. Y. at pp. 109, 110. [Back] Note 7 The Law of Torts, 6th ed. p. 51. [Back] Note 8 [1897] 2 Q B 57. [Back] Note 9 Negligence in Law, 2nd ed [Back] Note 10 (1816) 1 Stark 493; 18 R. R. [Back] Note 11 (1878) 3 Ex. D. 268. [Back] Note 12 (1883) 12 Q. B. D. 110. [Back] Note 13 [1897] 2 Q. B. at p. 61. pp. 81, 82 [Back] Note 15 (1890) 26 L. R. Ir. 428. 812. [Back] Note 16 26 L. R. Ir. at p. 442. [Back] Note 18 13 App Cas 222. [Back] Note 20 [1897] 2 Q B 57, at p. 61. [Back] Note 23 (1860) 5 H. & N. 679, at p. 688. [Back] Note 24 13 App Cas 222. [Back] Note 25 13 App. Cas. at p. 225. [Back] Note 26 [1896] 2 Q B 248, at p. 250. [Back] Note 27 26 L. R. Ir. 428. [Back] Note 28 On Damages, 8th ed. p. 861. [Back] Note 29 The Law of Torts, 6th ed. pp. 50-52. [Back] Note 30 Negligence in Law, 2nd ed. pp. 76-83. [Back] Note 31 26 L. R. Ir. at p. 439. [Back] Note 32 13 App Cas 222. [Back] Note 33 13 App. Cas. at p. 225. [Back] Note 35 151 N. Y. at p. 110. [Back] Note 36 1 Stark. 493 ; 18 R. R. 812. [Back] Note 37 12 Q. B. D. 110. [Back] Note 39 (1897) 60 Am. St. Rep. 393; 168 Mass. 285. Spade v. Lynn and Boston Rail Boad Co. appears to have been tried a second time after the decision of Allen J., reported 168 Mass. 285; 60 Am. St. Rep. 393. At the second trial it was proved that the defendants' conductor in removing a passenger from the car jostled another passenger and caused him to fall on the plaintiff, which of itself was a trifling matter, but the fright resulted in physical injury. This second trial resulted also in a verdict for the plaintiff; but the defendants again alleged exceptions which were sanctioned in a judgment of Holmes J. in January 1899, reported 172 Mass. 488; 70 Am. St. Rep. 298. [Back] Note 40 60 Am. St. Rep. at p. 395. [Back] Note 41 13 App Cas 222. [Back] Note 42 13 App. Cas. at p. 226. [Back] Note 43 26 L. R. Ir. 428. [Back] Note 44 26 L. R. Ir. 428. [Back] Note 45 26 L. R. Ir. 428. [Back] Note 46 [1897] 2 Q B 57. [Back] Note 47 1 Stark. 493; 18 R. R. 812. [Back] Note 48 (1869) L. R. 4 C. P. 739. [Back] Note 49 13 App Cas 222. [Back] Note 50 13 App Cas 222. [Back] Note 51 (1879) 4 P. D. 219, at p. 223. [Back] Note 52 (1875) L. R. 10 Ex. 261. [Back] Note 54 13 App Cas 222. [Back]