If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mr John Russell Supplicant. [1609] Mor 7325 (28 November 1609)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1609/Mor1807325-058.html
Cite as: [1609] Mor 7325

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1609] Mor 7325      

Subject_1 JURISDICTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IV.

Jurisdiction of the Court of Session.
Subject_3 SECT. I.

To what Causes this Jurisdiction extends.

Mr John Russell Supplicant

Date: 28 November 1609
Case No. No 58.

The Lords causa cognitæ reponed a procurator before an inferior court, who had been suspended by the judge.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Mr John Russell, procurator for Bessie Turnbull, and William Turnbull her father, in the action for annulling the pretended marriage betwixt the said Bessie and Robert Napier, depending before the Commissaries of Edinburgh, and in the process of adherence pursued by the said Robert against the said Bessie, gave in his eiked answers, in the said cause of adherence, in write, declared that the Commissaries should not be patrons of such a pernicious and shameful cause; and contended in these terms. “And albeit ye know the said marriage to be altogether null and unlawful, yet ye will proceed against all law and justice;” wherewith the Commissaries finding themselves greatly injured, they ordained Mr John to pay L. 12 of amand, and suspended him from procuring before them for a year; whereupon Mr John gave in his complaint to the Lords; and the Commissaries warned to answer to the complaint compearing, the matter was at length disputed upon these two heads; first, anent the power of the Commissaries in general, whether they might suspend or deprive an advocate admitted by the Lords; and next, if this fact of Mr John Russell merited suspension; wherein it was resolved, that the ordinary advocates admitted by the Lords, at their compearance in inferior courts, might so misbehave themselves, as the said inferior judges might justly and lawfully suspend and deprive them from any farther procuring in their courts; and as to Mr John Russell's particular offence, the Lords found it rash and indiscreet, and the Commissaries punishment very rigorous; and, therefore, calling in the said parties, and the hail advocates who assisted Mr John Russell, as in a common cause concerning all their liberties, the Lords admonished the advocates to be modest, and not to give occasion, by their contempt to judges, to unlaw, suspend, or deprive them; declaring also, that if any wrong were unjustly offered to modest advocates, the Lords would censure and repair it. And as for Mr John Russell, the Lords ordained him to be more reverent to the Commissaries in time coming, and to delete the words which they found contumelious in his defences; and ordained them to restore him to his liberty of procuration; and thereafter gave him up his supplication, because they would not have any record of that variance to remain.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 495. Haddington, MS. No 1659.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1609/Mor1807325-058.html