If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> L. Randkillor v - . [1624] Mor 295 (1 July 1624)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1624/Mor0100295-003.html
Cite as: [1624] Mor 295

[New search] [Contents list] [Context] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1624] Mor 295      

Subject_1 ADJUDICATION and APPRISING.
Subject_2 EXTINCTION of APPRISINGS and ADJUDICATIONS.

L Randkillor
v.
-

Date: 1 July 1624
Case No. No 3.

Comprisings expire ipso facto, by intromission. This allowed to be pleaded by way of exception in a removing.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a removing, pursued by Sibbald of Randkillor, contra, the defender compearing and defending himself with an infeftment of the lands libelled, proceeding upon a comprising, and clad with possession, before the right made to the pursuer by him, from whom the defender had comprised, as said is, and who was author to the pursuer:—And it being replied, conform to the act of Parliament, anno 1621, anent comprising, that the pursuer's author, from whom the defender had comprised the lands, was then minor; and that the defender's intromission with the mails and duties thereof, extended to as much as would satisfy him of his whole principal sums, for which he had comprised, and all the annuals and expences, and others mentioned in the act of Parliament; so that the comprising was extinguished, and could not furnish any defence: This reply was found relevant by the Lords, and received in this same place and judgment of removing, to be discussed, without any other trial, or action of declarator to be intented thereupon; and the parties were ordained presently to condescend and count upon the quantities of the mails and duties of the lands, and the defender's intromission therewith. Neither was it found necessary, that the pursuer should be urged to intent any new pursuit, or declarator, but received the trial summarly in this place; albeit the defender contended, that in this judgment it ought not to be taken in, but that his infeftment, clad with possession, should maintain him, ay and while it were taken away by some direst pursuit, which was repelled, in respect of the act of Parliament, which appoints the comprising to expire, ipso facto where satisfaction is received in manner foresaid; which words, viz. To expire ipso facto, the Lords found, gave warrant for summar trials.

Act. Lermonth. Alt. Aiton Clerk, Gibson.

The like done 21st March 1629, Scarlet against her Tenants, by way of suspension of a decreet of removing against the tenants, and only the compriser, who was called to the decreet, compearing in the suspension, to defend the tenants, who were decerned in absence.

Durie, p. 133.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1624/Mor0100295-003.html