If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Oliphant v Oliphant. [1626] Mor 3923 (15 July 1626)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1626/Mor0903923-097.html

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1626] Mor 3923      

Subject_1 EXECUTOR.
Subject_2 SECT. X.

Act 14th, Parl. 1617, relative to retention of a Third.

Oliphant
v.
Oliphant

Date: 15 July 1626
Case No. No 97.

A man having left a stranger executor and universal legatee; in a process against him, at the instance of the defunct's nearest of kin, the Lords found the whole gear to belong to the defender, notwithstanding the act of Parliament 1617. c. 14.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In an action betwixt Oliphant and Oliphant, wherein Thomas Oliphant, as brother and nearest of kin to umquhile James Oliphant, pursues Margaret Oliphant, who was left executrix and universal legatrix to the said umquhile James, who died without bairns, wife, sister, or brother, except the said pursuer, to make payment to him of the two parts of the defunct's gear, as nearest of kin to him, conform to the act of Parliament anno 1617; against the which pursuit, the defender alleged, That the pursuer could have no part of the defunct's gear, in respect the defunct not only left the defender his executrix, but also made her his universal legatrix, whereby she had the only undoubted right to his whole goods; and the pursuer replying, That the act of Parliament foresaid gave the legatrix only right to the defunct's third; so that if it exceeded the third, the foresaid act did so limit the same, that the legatar should only have the third, and should not be heard to claim both the third and legacy also, whereby it is manifest, that the universal legatrix could seek no more by virtue of the legacy, albeit alleged to be universal, but only the third, and no more, and that the two parts pertained only to the nearest of kin. This exception was repelled, and the right to the gear totally was found to pertain to the defender, but any deduction, by reason of the said universal legacy, notwithstanding of the act of Parliament foresaid, which act was found not to debar any person in testament to leave all his gear, whereupon he might dispone of the law to any person he pleased, and which being done, his nearest of kin was thereby fully debarred.

Act. ——. Alt. Aiton. Clerk, Gibson. Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 278. Durie, p. 219.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1626/Mor0903923-097.html