If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Lundie v Gourlay. [1627] Mor 7424 (11 January 1627)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Mor1807424-139.html
Cite as: [1627] Mor 7424

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1627] Mor 7424      

Subject_1 JURISDICTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION IV.

Jurisdiction of the Court of Session.
Subject_3 SECT. VII.

Nobile officium.

Lundie
v.
Gourlay

Date: 11 January 1627
Case No. No 139.

The Lords having appointed instrumentary witnesses to be examined as to the cause of the deed to which they were witnesses, granted a commission for examining one of the witnesses, who, from age and sickness, was not able to appear, notwithstanding of the maxim, that ea quĉ sunt ex nobili officio non possunt delegari.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In an action pursued by Andrew Lundie against John Gourlay, for payment of 500 merks, contained in a bond given by the defender to the Laird of Lundie, father to the pursuer, to whom he was executor, the Lords having found, that the witnesses insert in that bond should be examined ex officio, for trial of the cause of the obligation and debt therein contained; and a day for that effect being assigned to the defender to summon them to compear before the Lords, one of the said witnesses being excused for age and sickness, and therefore a commission being craved to examine him; and the pursuers contending, that, in matters of this quality, no commission ought to be given, where the ordinance was done ex officio judicis nobili, and for informing of the judge in such particulars, which would occur to be inquired at the witnesses when they should compear, and as should occur to be asked for clearing of any doubts which the Lords would desire to be resolved of in the trying of that process, and which could not be done by virtue of any private commission, no more than witnesses of improbation could be examined by private commissions, except only by the Lords themselves.———The Lords found, that, notwithstanding this examination was ordained to be done only ex officio, yet that they would grant a commission to examine this witness, who, for age and sickness, was not able to compear before them; and, for that effect, ordained the judge, to whom commission should be granted, to examine him upon the interrogatories to be given in by both parties, and all articles which might give light to discover the true cause of the giving of the bond, that thereby the Lords might more clearly decide in the cause after the said examination. Yet it is a maxim with us, that ea quæ sunt ex nobili officio non possunt delegari. But Bartol. calls mixtum imperium officium nobile, ad L, 3. N. 15. De jurisdictione. Et imperium mixtum (sicut jurisdictio cui cohæret) potest delegari, et hodie etiam ea quæ competunt jure magistratus possunt delegari.

Act. Aiton. Alt. Nicolson & Craig. Clerk, Scot. Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 498. Durie, p. 256.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Mor1807424-139.html