If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Wilson v L. Tinto. [1631] Mor 3924 (9 July 1631)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1631/Mor0903924-099.html
Cite as: [1631] Mor 3924

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1631] Mor 3924      

Subject_1 EXECUTOR.
Subject_2 SECT. X.

Act 14th, Parl. 1617, relative to retention of a Third.

Wilson
v.
L Tinto.

Date: 9 July 1631
Case No. No 99.

Found as above.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

A defunct having nominated executors, and in the same testament having left all his gear in legacies to his bairns, one of the bairns pursuing the executors for the legacy left by his father to him for his own part; and the defender alleging, That he had retention of a third part thereof, conform to the act of Parliament 1617, which gives that proportion of the defunct's third to the executor nominated, the Lords repelled this allegeance; for they found, That where any defunct in his testament nominates executors, and in that same testament leaves all his gear to legatars, others than the executor nominated by him; in such cases the executor has only nudum officium, and has no right by that act to any part of the goods of the defunct; in which cases, the act of Parliament foresaid militates not, and cannot be drawn beyond the cases expressed in the act, which provides for the bairns of the defunct, and the nearest of kin pretermitted in the defunct's testament, wherein he had nominated executors, and declared what quantities of the goods eo casu shall pertain to the executor; for this act of Parliament puts not the executors in better case than wherein they were before that act; and before that act, when the defunct left his whole goods in legacy, the executor then could have no part thereof; even so after the making of this act, the same should stand; and as if the debt should exhaust the whole gear, the executor by this act could retain nothing to himself, eo casu the like reason is where all is left to legatars, specially to the defunct's own bairns; for in this case the nomination of executors is but the granting of a naked office and burden, which the executor has liberty to accept or refuse as he pleaseth; and, if he hold himself free, cannot be compelled to embrace the same, and needs not to confirm, if he please to renounce the office.

Act. Gilmour. Alt. ——. Clerk, Gibson. Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 278. Durie, p. 593.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1631/Mor0903924-099.html