If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> John Veatch v Wedderlie. [1672] Mor 10640 (6 December 1672)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1672/Mor2510640-036.html
Cite as: [1672] Mor 10640

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1672] Mor 10640      

Subject_1 POSSESSORY JUDGMENT.
Subject_2 SECT. V.

In what Subjects Possessory Judgment takes place.

John Veatch
v.
Wedderlie

Date: 6 December 1672
Case No. No 36.

A possessory judgment by several years possession, was found competent in the case of Stipend.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The kirk of Westruther being erected in anno, 1650, there was a locality not only out of the teinds, but by a bond of the heritors so much localled upon their stock. The minister was accordingly in possession, till of late that Wedderlie one of the heritors suspends on this reason, that there was no decreet of locality produced, but only letters of horning. It was answered, That ministers being in possession of their stipends for the space of seven years, have the benefit of a possessory judgment, because ordinarily they have no writs but use of payment of their stipends, and any writs their predecessors had, are ordinarily between hands lost; and this decreet of locality had been lost, but the letters of horning contain the whole tenor of it. It was replied, that in stipends constituted in teinds, which are ordinary, much might be yeilded to the ministers; but when it affects the stock, as to that they have no privilege.

The Lords found, that the minister's possession ought not to be interrupted, until the suspender by a reduction and declarator should call the same in question, which they reserved, and in which they would consider, whether the minister was decennalis et triennalis possessor, and how far that would operate.

Stair, v. 2. p. 129.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1672/Mor2510640-036.html