BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions

PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW


To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.


Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.


Thank you for your support!


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Aitchison v Dickson. [1684] Mor 15032 (00 February 1684)
URL: https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1684/Mor3415032-039.html
Cite as: [1684] Mor 15032

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1684] Mor 15032      

Subject_1 SUPERIOR AND VASSAL.
Subject_2 SECT. X.

What Sort of Singular Successors entitled to be received by the Superior? - Whether the Seller or Purchaser bound to enter?

Aitchison
v.
Dickson

1684. February.
Case No. No. 39.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Earl of Roxburgh having granted a feu-infeftment to Adam Niven of a house in Kelso, and having disponed the same to John Dickson, who was infeft, to be holden base of the granter, and John Dickson having entered into a minute with James Aitchison, by which he was obliged to dispone the house, and to grant him a sufficient disposition, containing a procurator of resignation and precept of sasine; and John Dickson being charged for granting of the disposition; he suspended, upon consignation of a disposition, bearing an obligation to infeft, and procuratory of resignation. Answered, That the suspender being infeft holding base of Niven, his author, the disposition was not sufficient, unless he should procure the base infeftment to be confirmed by the Earl of Roxburgh, superior. The Lords found the disposition sufficient, and that the clause of the bond obliging the suspender to grant a sufficient disposition, did not import that he should obtain himself infeft to be holden of the superior, or procure a confirmation of Niven's base infeftment.

Sir P. Home MS. v.1. No.563.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1684/Mor3415032-039.html