BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions

PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW


To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.


Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.


Thank you for your support!


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Russel v John Brown of Scotstoun. [1687] Mor 8177 (8 December 1687)
URL: https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1687/Mor2008177-015.html
Cite as: [1687] Mor 8177

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1687] Mor 8177      

Subject_1 LEGITIM.
Subject_2 SECT. III.

Children have right to Legitim proprio jure.

Russel
v.
John Brown of Scotstoun

Date: 8 December 1687
Case No. No 15.

Found in conformity with the above.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Found that a right of legitim transmits without confirmation. 2do, That forisfamiliation of a daughter by marriage, doth not prejudge her portion-natural, unless discharged by her, albeit she got a tocher, which only obliged her to collate.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 544. Harcarse, (Executry.) No 475. p. 129. *** Sir P. Home reports this case:

1687. November.—Mr William Russel and his children having pursued George Brown of Scotstoun, the children's uncle by the mother, as executor to his father, for payment of a proportional part of his moveables as their mother's legitim, alleged for the defender, That he being executor confirmed, as nearest of kin to the defunct, and the pursuer's mother not being confirmed in her own lifetime, the defender, as being the nearest of kin, did exclude the pursuers, the oyes, seeing there is no representation in mobilibus; as also, that the pursuer's mother was married before the defunct her father's decease, and had gotten a portion, and so had no right to any legitim. Answered, That the right of legitim is transmitted without a confirmation; and, children's receiving of portions from the father, does not prejudge them of their legitim, unless it be expressly renounced and discharged. The Lords repelled the defence, and found that the legitim must transmit, albeit the mother died before the confirmation of the father's testament; and found, that notwithstanding the daughter was married, she has right to the legitim, except she had renounced the same when she received her portion; and decerned for the proportion of the whole goods contained in the inventory.

Sir Pat. Home, MS. v. 3.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1687/Mor2008177-015.html