If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Channell v Seton. [1693] Mor 839 (16 February 1693)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1693/Mor0200839-029.html
Cite as: [1693] Mor 839

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1693] Mor 839      

Subject_1 ASSIGNATION.
Subject_2 Whether Assignation not intimated denudes.

Channell
v.
Seton

Date: 16 February 1693
Case No. No 29.

The registration of a bond by an assignee after the cedent's death, is informal.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The debate between Anne Channell, relict of Mr Alexander Seton minister at Lithgow, against Sir Walter Seton, was advised; and the Lords found the registration of the bond by an assignee after the cedent's death was informal, though the debtor was alive; because the registration was a decreet of consent, which required actor et reus, and here the actor was dead, and so there could be no decreet at his instance; and it was not sufficient, that it was not done by an assignee who had not intimate his assignation in the cedent's life; for though it be payable to the creditor, and his assignee, so it is likewise to his heirs and executors, and yet, they could not summarly registrate, so that the mandate died here, both morte mandantis et mandatarii; though it was argued, that the procurator was the mandatarius here and not the creditor. (The Lords had found the contrary between Reid and Mr James Deas advocate:* But there he had paid annualrents to the assignee:) But, not to cast the assignee too far back, they sustained this charge as a libel; and ordained the defender to answer thereto, but so as to get terms to prove, and not to be put to verify instantly as in a suspension: And for proving, that there could not be summar execution by registration, where either the granter or receiver was dead, the following decisions were cited out of Durie, p. 102. 27th January 1624, Inglis, voce Process; and 30th of July 1625, Lady Stonyhill, Durie, p. 185. voce Tutor and Pupil; 16th March 1627, Bruce, Durie, p. 291. voce Summar Diligence; 1st December 1630, Chappeltown, Durie, p. 544. voce Summar Diligence; 19th march 1631, Crighton, Durie, p, 584. voce Summar Diligence; 15th January 1635, Shank, Durie, p. 742. voce Summar Diligence; 12 th February 1635, Brown, Durie, p. 754. voce Summar Diligence.

Some proposed that it would be a great ease to the lieges, and dispatch of justice, to make some regulation for the future, that execution may summarly pass at the assignee's instance, though the creditor be dead, especially now since the act of parliament 1690, not requiring confirmation of special assignations.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 62. Fountainhall, v. 1. p. 561.

* Fount, v. 1. p. 536. voce Summar Process.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1693/Mor0200839-029.html