If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mrs Grissel Bruce Lady Riddoch v Hugh Forsyth of Garvel. [1709] Mor 3512 (11 June 1709)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1709/Mor0903512-048.html
Cite as: [1709] Mor 3512

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1709] Mor 3512      

Subject_1 DILIGENCE.
Subject_2 SECT. VI.

Diligence prestable by Tutors and Curators.

Mrs Grissel Bruce Lady Riddoch
v.
Hugh Forsyth of Garvel

Date: 11 June 1709
Case No. No 48.

A tutor was found liable for annualrents of the pupil's money unuplifted by him during his office, and not allowed to discharge himself with the annualrents, yet resting in the hands of responsible debtors; but the Lords ordained the pupil to furnish him with the bonds for procuring payment of these outstanding annualrents.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In the action of compt and reckoning for tutory intromissions mentioned voce Tutor and Pupil, at the instance of the Lady Riddoch against Garvel; the tutor was found liable for any annualrents of the pupil's money run on unuplifted by him during his office, and not allowed to discharge himself with the annualrents, as yet resting in the hands of responsal debtors; though he offered warrandice and caution that they are not uplifted; in respect law obligeth tutors to state their pupil's annualrents in a principal sum bearing annualrent once during their office; and warranting the same to be still resting, doth only found a second plea to the minor upon the tutor's warrandice. But the pursuer was ordained to furnish the defender with the bonds for procuring payment of these outstanding annualrents. And the defender was to have allowance for cess, teind, and feu-duty of these years, for which he holds compt for the rent of the land, upon procuring declarations from the collectors of the cess, the chamberlains of the titular of the teinds, and superior of the lands, that the cess, teind, and feu-duties of such years were paid, and finding caution to relieve the pursuer thereof, albeit the defender had not the particular receipts to produce. But he got no allowance for incident personal charges in the pupil's affairs, not particularly instructed; in respect inventories were not given up in the terms of the act of Parliament 1672. Albeit it was alleged that the tutor had done the equivalent, by signing an inventory of the pupil's whole estate, writs and evidents, in presence of her nearest relations on the father and mother's side, and giving up the said inventory to be kept by them, as a charge and check against him.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 241. Forbes, p. 331.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1709/Mor0903512-048.html