If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomas Law, Son to William Law Taylor in Jedburgh v Thomas Turnbull of Firth. [1710] Mor 7156 (24 November 1710)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1710/Mor1707156-031.html
Cite as: [1710] Mor 7156

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1710] Mor 7156      

Subject_1 INTERDICTION.
Subject_2 SECT. IV.

Interdicter may not be auctor in rem suam. - Manner of adhibiting the Interdicter's consent. - Effect of the Death of the Interdicter.

Thomas Law, Son to William Law Taylor in Jedburgh
v.
Thomas Turnbull of Firth

Date: 24 November 1710
Case No. No 31.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In the action at the instance of Thomas Law, against Thomas Turnbull, as representing his father, for payment of a bond granted by him to the pursuer's father; the Lords were clearly of opinion, that a bond granted by an interdicted person without consent of his interdictors, could not be supported as valid by their subscribing witnesses to it.

Forbes, p. 442.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1710/Mor1707156-031.html