If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Bell v Herdman. [1727] Mor 11039 (14 February 1727)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1727/Mor2611039-234.html
Cite as: [1727] Mor 11039

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1727] Mor 11039      

Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION VII.

Septennial Prescription of Cautionary Obligations, by act 5th Parl. 1695.
Subject_3 SECT. III.

Effect of Intimation to the Creditor. - Interruption of the Prescription.

Bell
v.
Herdman

Date: 14 February 1727
Case No. No 234.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

It was found, that the creditor's private knowledge is not sufficient, but that there must be an intimation by way of instrument, under the hand of a notary, at the time of signing or delivering the bond.—See Appendix.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 116.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1727/Mor2611039-234.html