If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Stirling of Herbertshire v Feuars of Denny. [1731] Mor 1717 (25 June 1731)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1731/Mor0401717-001.html
Cite as: [1731] Mor 1717

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1731] Mor 1717      

Subject_1 BONA FIDE CONSUMPTION.
Subject_2 SECT. I.

Bona Fide Possession of Teinds.

Stirling of Herbertshire
v.
Feuars of Denny

Date: 25 June 1731
Case No. No 1.

An heritor possessing his own teinds, by virtue of a tack from another as tacksman, found to be bona fide possessor, until interpelled by the regular titular. Payment to the minister for 40 years, without challenge from the titular, found to exoner the heritor of all bygones.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a pursuit against feuars, at the titular's instance, for the teinds of their lands intromitted with by them; the defence pleaded for bygones was, That they had been in use, past memory of man, to pay a certain duty, in name of teind, to the minister of the parish, presumed to have had a title, since no other titular appeared; and therefore quoad the residue they were bona fide possessors.—Answered, Ministers have a right to maintainance out of the teinds, but cannot be presumed to be titulars, especially since the act 1690, giving to the patron the same share of teind, that then remained with the clergy; and the receipts of teind-duty taken from the minister by the heritors, destroy this presumption, bearing ‘teinds payable to him out of the lands;’ so that the receipts do not so much as insinuate, that the minister was titular, or had a power to discharge the whole teinds. Found, that the sums paid to the minister do not exoner the heritors from paying the remainder of their teinds to the titular, and found them liable for 40 years preceding the citation.

This decision was reversed by the House of Lords, and payment to the minister for 40 years, was sustained as bona fide payment quoad the whole teinds; which seems to be reasonable, for the heritor must uplift the teind, to save it from perishing in the tenants hands; and it would be hard to oblige him to be another man's factor without a salary.

In this case it was likewise found, That an heritor possessing his own teinds by virtue of a tack from another, as tacksman, is a bona fide possessor until interpelled by the real titular.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 110.

See The particulars voce Teinds.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1731/Mor0401717-001.html