If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Robertson v M'Inlay. [1736] Mor 11010 (3 December 1736)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1736/Mor2611010-210.html
Cite as: [1736] Mor 11010

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1736] Mor 11010      

Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION VII.

Septennial Prescription of Cautionary Obligations, by act 5th Parl. 1695.
Subject_3 SECT. I.

Relates to Obligations for Money.

Robertson
v.
M'Inlay

Date: 3 December 1736
Case No. No 210.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

M'Inlay having become bound as cautioner, in a bond of presentation, to present the person of Archibald Hamilton against a day certain, otherwise to pay the debt;

The Lords found he was not entitled to the benefit of the prescription introduced by the act 1695.

C. Home, No 39. p. 72.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1736/Mor2611010-210.html