If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Clerk of Glendorich v Ferguson of Townhead. [1738] 2 Elchies 136 (30 June 1738)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1738/Elchies020136-004.html
Cite as: [1738] 2 Elchies 136

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1738] 2 Elchies 136      

Subject_1 COMPENSATION - RETENTION.

Clerk of Glendorich
v.
Ferguson of Townhead

1738. June 30. July 28.
Case No. No. 4.

Effect of fraud in refernce to Compensation.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

William Murray, of Townhead, took a bond from his son John for L.50 sterling in name of another infant son James. After William's death, Clerk of Glendorich confirmed executor-creditor to him, and gave up this bond of James's in the testament, and obtained a decreet of reduction and declarator against James, finding the bond was presumed William the father's money, and affectable by his creditors, and therefore carried by his confirmed testament, and against John decerning to pay the money to Clerk; and having thereupon inhibited John, and now pursuing reduction of a sale of his lands, the defenders proponed compensation against the L.50 bond due by John, by debts of greater value due to John by William his father; but the Lords found that the said debt due by John to his brother James Murray, as it stood in the pursuer Clerk of Glendorich's person, was not compensable by the debts due to John by William his father, because John could not have compensed it against his brother James by these debts due to him by his father; and though his granting the bond in the name of his brother James could not prejudge the creditors of William the father, whose money it truly was, yet their being reponed against the fraud could not benefit John the debtor, nor any deriving right from him.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1738/Elchies020136-004.html