BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions

PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW


To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.


Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.


Thank you for your support!


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Roseberry v Geddes of Scotstoun, &c. [1740] Mor 10405 (23 July 1740)
URL: https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1740/Mor2510405-084.html
Cite as: [1740] Mor 10405

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1740] Mor 10405      

Subject_1 PERSONAL and TRANSMISSIBLE.
Subject_2 SECT. III.

What Rights go to Assignees.

Earl of Roseberry
v.
Geddes of Scotstoun, &c

Date: 23 July 1740
Case No. No 84.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Earl of Roseberry's estate being sequestrated by the Lords at the suit of his creditors, and L. 100 Sterling yearly allowed to himself in name of aliment; upon a complaint by the Earl against certain of his creditors for having poinded his horse, which he affirmed to have been purchased by him with the money allowed for his aliment, the Lords founds, “That the horse being by the execution of poinding estimated at L. 9 Sterling, was not poindable, and ordained the poinder to restore.”

The day before, the Lords had found another horse of his poindable, because being of L. 50 Sterling value, such horse could not be presumed purchased by his aliment; but a horse of so low a value as L. 9 was what reasonably might be purchased out of the aliment for his use, and so was as little poindable as the aliment itself was arrestable.

Kilkerran, (Aliment and Education.) No 3. p. 22.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1740/Mor2510405-084.html