If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Anderson v Andersons. [1743] 1 Elchies 123 (22 November 1743)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1743/Elchies010123-012.html

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1743] 1 Elchies 123      

Subject_1 EXECUTOR.

Anderson
v.
Andersons

1743, Nov. 22.
Case No. No. 12.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The question was, Whether a discharge by a son to his father, his heirs, executors, and successors, of certain intromissions with effects of the sons, and of his bairns part of gear, and of all he could claim of or from him and his foresaids by and through his decease, or for any other cause or occasion whatsoever, did exclude the son from succeeding in the dead's part? The Commissaries found that it did exclude him. But upon Arniston's report we found it did not, as we found in a like case 30th June 1741, Pringle against Pringle.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1743/Elchies010123-012.html