![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Anderson v Andersons. [1743] 1 Elchies 123 (22 November 1743) URL: https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1743/Elchies010123-012.html |
[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 EXECUTOR.
Anderson
v.
Andersons
1743 ,Nov. 22 .
Case No.No. 12.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The question was, Whether a discharge by a son to his father, his heirs, executors, and successors, of certain intromissions with effects of the sons, and of his bairns part of gear, and of all he could claim of or from him and his foresaids by and through his decease, or for any other cause or occasion whatsoever, did exclude the son from succeeding in the dead's part? The Commissaries found that it did exclude him. But upon Arniston's report we found it did not, as we found in a like case 30th June 1741, Pringle against Pringle.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting