If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Robert Cleland v Freeholders of Linlithgow. [1746] 5 Brn 743 (4 June 1746)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1746/Brn050743-0915.html

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1746] 5 Brn 743      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, collected by JAMES BURNETT, LORD MONBODDO.
Subject_2 MONBODDO.

Robert Cleland
v.
Freeholders of Linlithgow

Date: 4 June 1746

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

[Falconer, No. 115.]

This case was mentioned, June 4, 1745. The Lords now reversed their interlocutor, and found that the old extent, in this case, was not distinct from the feu-duty, and therefore, by the Act 1681, which was in no respect abrogated by the late Act, the vote was not good. Elchies said, that besides the coincidence of the sums in this case, and the well known practice of juries in such cases, it was evident that the inquest, here, had not followed the rule which was ordinarily followed in retouring the King’s property lands after the 1597. This rule, as we learn from Sir George M'Kenzie, and other writers, was for every quatuor bovatæ terræ, four oxgangs of land, one pound of old extent. Now, according to this rule, there ought to be here forty ploughs, whereas, it is believed, there is not the tenth part of that number.

The like decided, unanimously, June 22, 1747. Arniston and Drummore declared themselves of a different opinion; but, in respect of the former decision, would not vote.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1746/Brn050743-0915.html