If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?

Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> A. v B. [1747] Mor 2648 (25 February 1747)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1747/Mor0702648-110.html
Cite as: [1747] Mor 2648

[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1747] Mor 2648      

Subject_1 COMPENSATION - RETENTION.
Subject_2 SECT. XIV.

Compensation or Retention not Proponable after Decree.

A
v.
B

Date: 25 February 1747
Case No. No 110.

Decided in conformity with No 106. p. 2642.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

On a verbal report of an Ordinary, Whether compensation was competent after decree in absence, following on a summons against one of many debtors? The Lords demurred till precedents should be looked out; and a former case being condescended on, wherein the suspender had been admitted to plead compensation, in respect of that speciality that the decree had been taken against the defender called among many other debtors; the Court judged accordingly, and ‘allowed the suspender to propone compensation.’

Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 149. Kilkerran, (Compensation & Retention.) No 2. p. 136.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1747/Mor0702648-110.html