![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
United Kingdom Asylum and Immigration Tribunal |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Asylum and Immigration Tribunal >> UK (Use of N judgment as a benchmark in ill-health cases) Rwanda [2004] UKIAT 00262 (21 September 2004) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIAT/2004/00262.html Cite as: [2004] UKIAT 00262, [2004] UKIAT 262 |
[New search]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
UK (Use of N judgment as a benchmark in ill-health cases) Rwanda
[2004] UKIAT 00262
Date of hearing: 2 August 2004
Date Determination notified: 21 September 2004
Secretary of State for the Home Department | APPELLANT |
and | |
UK | RESPONDENT |
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
'I intend only to emphasise that an Article 3 case of this kind must be based on facts, which are not only exceptional, but extreme: extreme, that is, judged in the context of cases all or many of which (like this one) demands one's sympathy on pressing grounds' (emphasis added).
Thus the facts of N also furnish a benchmark as to what is necessary to cross the Article 3 threshold.