[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
England and Wales High Court (Family Division) Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Family Division) Decisions >> London Borough of Hillingdon v AO [2014] EWHC 75 (Fam) (23 January 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/75.html Cite as: [2014] EWHC 75 (Fam) |
[New search] [Context] [View without highlighting] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
FAMILY DIVISION
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
THE LONDON BOROUGH OF HILLINGDON |
Applicant |
|
- and - |
||
A O -and- A O -and- A By the child's Guardian, Julie Green -and- DR R |
1st Respondent 2nd Respondent 3rd Respondent Intervenor |
____________________
Mr Dermot Casey Counsel for the 1st and 2nd Respondents
Ms Deirdre Fottrell Counsel for the Guardian
Ms Fiona Paterson Counsel for the Intervenor
Hearing dates: 9th to 13th, 16th and 18th December 2013
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
MRS JUSTICE HOGG :
1. They were to take the herbs as instructed;
2. They were not to seek orthodox western, modern medical treatment whilst taking the herbal treatment. They were told that if she went for a scan the power of the treatment was such the baby would not be seen on the scan;
3. The mother could not give birth in London, she had to travel to Lagos for the birth as she would be unable to deliver the child at all without the administration of the third and final herb.