[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
England and Wales High Court (Family Division) Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Family Division) Decisions >> Z (A Child) [2022] EWHC 1005 (Fam) (03 May 2022) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2022/1005.html Cite as: [2022] EWHC 1005 (Fam) |
[New search] [Context] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
FAMILY DIVISION
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT 1989
IN THE MATTER OF THE SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION ACT 2003
AND IN THE MATTER OF Z (A Child) (born on 3rd March 2011 aged 11)
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
M |
Applicant |
|
and |
||
F and Z (A Child) (By her guardian) |
1st Respondent 2nd Respondent |
____________________
1st Respondent [M] in person
Ms Sally Bradley (instructed by Cafcass Legal) for the 2nd Respondent child
(By her rule 16.4 guardian)
Hearing dates: 7th & 8th April 2022
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
All parties and participants in any remote hearing shall take notice that Section 55 and Schedule 25 of the Coronavirus Act 2020 have provided by Section 85C of the Courts Act 2003 that it is an offence for a person to make or attempt to make an unauthorised recording or an unauthorised transmission of an image or sound which is being transmitted through a live video link or a live audio link, or an image of, or sound made by, any person while that person is participating in court proceedings through a live video link or a live audio link
The Honourable Ms Justice Russell DBE:
Introduction
History and background since 2017
Application to adjourn the hearing by F
The Evidence
The Parents' Evidence
The Law.
i) F has exerted emotional pressure on Z in an attempt to influence her wishes and feelings and bring them in line with his own.
ii) In so doing he has had no regard for her welfare and prioritised his own needs above her own.
iii) F is unable to accept responsibility for his conduct seeking to blame M and professionals instead.
iv) F has [demonstrated] no awareness that his behaviour carries emotional consequences for Z's emotional and physical wellbeing and his current and future relationship with her.
v) F's continuing lack of insight and understanding of Z's needs places her at risk of significant harm should there be no safeguards in place by way of supervision of their time together and the imposition of a section 91 (14) order.
Conclusions and Orders
Note 1 Muslim Council of Britain (2019) Position on Flu Vaccines https://mcb.org.uk/mcb-updates/position-on-flu-vaccines/ [Back] Note 2 West London Clinical Commissioning Groups (2020) Flu nasal vaccine is permissible for children says British Fatwa Council https://www.westlondonccg.nhs.uk/news-publications-events/news/flu-nasal-vaccine-permissible-children-says-british-fatwa-council [Back] Note 3 Dr Musharraf Hussain Al-Azhari (2020) Fatwa on Flu vaccine containing Porcine gelatine https://www.britishfatwacouncil.org/2020/10/fatwa-on-flu-vaccine-containing-porcine-gelatine/ [Back] Note 4 Public Health England (2020) Vaccines and porcine gelatine. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/933552/Vaccines_porcine_gelatine_2020_A4.pdf [Back] Note 5 https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/jun/08/on-a-rampage-the-african-women-fighting-to-end-fgm
[Back]