BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Balfour Fowler v John Gillespie. [1789] Mor 1378 (20 February 1789)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1789/Mor0401378-015.html
Cite as: [1789] Mor 1378

[New search] [Context] [View without highlighting] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1789] Mor 1378      

Subject_1 BATTERY.
Subject_2 *** In the Eighth Parliament of King James VI. chap. 138. anno 1584.

His majesty, with advise and consent of his Hienes three Estaits of this present Parliament, hes ratified and appreived, and be the tenour hereof, ratifies and appreivis the act and statute under-written: and decernis and declairis the same, to have strength, force and effect of ane act of Parliament, of the quhilk the tenour followis. - At Edinburgh, the penult day of Maij, the zeir of God, ane thousand five hundreth four scoir three zeires. The quhilk day, in presence of the Kingis Majestie, sittand in judgement, and Lordes of his Hienes Councel and Session, compeired Maister David Makgil of Nisbet, Advocate to his Majestie, and in the name of his Hienes maist faithful, humble, and obedient subjectes, exponed and declared, how in the Parliament halden at Edinburgh, the xx. day of Junij, the zeir of God 1555 zeires, be his Majesties umqhile dearest Gue-dame Marie Queene Dowrier, and Regent of this realme for the time: ane ordinance and act of Parliament was maid, anent the slauchter of parties in persute and desense of their actiones; quhilk act, althoucht in the selfe maist profitable and necessarie, to have bene ane perpetual law in all times thereafter, for repressing of proud and undauntoned braggares, boasters, and oppressours of their parties: Zit was the same only temporal, for the space of three zieres, after the making thereof; quhilk act, the said Advocate, in name, and for the causes foirsaidis, desired to be renewed and established in ane perpetual law in all times cumming, with the augmentations following. Upon the quhilk desire, our Soveraine Lord, willing to follow the gude example and intention of his predecessores, for the reverence and increase of justice, and assurance of the parties in persute and defence of their actiones, and executiones of the same, hes with advise of the saidis Lordis of his Councel and Session, ordained, decerned, and declared, that fra this day foorth, in all times cumming, gif it fall happen either the defender or persewer, to slay, or wound, to the effusion of blude, or utherways to invade any of them ane uther in ony sort, quhair upon they may be criminally accused, after the raising of summonds or precepts, and lawful execution theirof, or in ony time befoir the complete execution of the decreet to be given thereupon: The committer of the slauchter, blude, or invasion, in maner foresaid, or being airt, pairt, red or councel thereof; gif it be the defender, sall be condemned at the instance of the persewer; or in case of his decease, of the nearest of the kin of him quha is slaine, wounded to the effusion of his blude, or invaded, havand richt thereto, without ony probation of the libel persewed, except summar cognition to be tane of the slauchter, blude-sched, or invasion, before the Justice, or uther criminal Judge, competent thereto, be conviction, or beand fugitive and put to the horne. And gif the decreete be given, the same to be unreduceable for ever. And gif the persewer slay, wound to the effusion of blude, or invade the defender, as it is above written, or be airt, pairt, red or councel thereof, cognition being tane, as said is; in that case the defender, or in case of his decease, the nearest of his kin, able to succeede in that richt, sall heve absolvitour fra the libel of the persewer simpliciter, against the quhilk the persewer, nor na uther be his richt, sall ever be heard be way of reduction or restitution in integrum, in ony time thereafter, quhat age, condition, or qualitie that ever the slayer, drawer of the blude, or invader foresaid be of: The proces of transferring in the causes above-written respective, to be upon ane fifteene dayes warning, but diet, table, or continuation of utheris summondes. And gif the slayer, schedder of blude, or invader, as said is, hes landes or liferentes, and beis denunced rebel, and put to the horne, for non-finding of sovertie, or non-comperance to underly the law, for the said slauchter, blude-sched, or invasion; in that case the slayer, schedder of blude, or invader, incontinent after the denunciation, sall tyne the lyferent of his landes, benefice, office, and utheris rentes, and commodities quhatsumever for his lyfetime, without ony farder delay of zeir and day, as in uther causes of tinsel of lyferentes, through being zeir and day at the horne.

Attour our Soveraine Lord, be the faith and duetie of ane Christiane Prince, promisis to give na respett, nor remission to the offendares in fik causes. And gif his Majestie or his successours dois in the contrare, (as is not beleeved) the using of the said respett, or remission be ony of the parties, persewer, or defender, sall be the like cause, and of the samin effect, as their conviction, for the cause abone specified. And this act and ordinance to indure for the space of seven zeirs immediatlie heirafter; and to be confirmed in his Hienes nixt Parliament, to have the strength and effect of ane act theirof, and to be observed as an perpetual law, in time cumming.

Acts of Parliament, v. 1. p. 485.

*** In the Fourteenth Parliament of King James VI. chap. 219. anno 1594.

His majesty, having consideration of the manifold oppressiones done within this realme, and for the maist parte occurring betuixt parties contending in justice, be proud and undantoned braggers, boasters and oppressoures: And understanding that there was ane acte of Parliament maid of lang time by past; first in the dayes of unquhill Marie, Queene Dowager, his Hienesse Gud-dame, of worthy memory, quhilk was only temporall, for the space of three zeires nixt following, and approven be his Hienesse in his Parliament halden at Edinburgh, in the moneth of Maij, ane thousand five hundreth four score four zeires; quairby it was found and declared, that if ony person, ather persewer or defender, suld happen to slay or wound to the effusion of blood, or otherwise to invade ane of them ane uther in ony sorte, quhairupon they micht be oriminally accused, after the raising of the summondes and precepts, and lauchfull execution thereof, or in ony time before the compleit execution to be recovered thereupon: The committer of the slaughter, bloud or invasion, in maner foresaid, or being airt, pairt, red or councell thereof; gif it be the defender, he sall be condemned at the instance of the persewer, gif he be on life; or in case of his decase, the nearest of his kinne, quha is slaine, without ony probation of the libel, except summar cognition to be tane of the slaughter, blood shed or invasion, before the Justice, or ony uther judge competent thereto: And gif the persewer slayis, woundis or invadis the defender, as said is, or be art, pairt, red or councell thereof, cognition being tane, in case the defender be on live, or in case of his decease, the nearest of kinne, sall have absolvitour fra the persewer's libell: And gif the slayer, shedder of bloud, or invader, as said is, hes landes or liferentes, and beis denunced rebell, and put to the horne, for none-finding of soverty, or none-compearance, to underly the law for the said slauchter, blood-shed, or invasion; in that case, the slayer, shedder of blood, or invader, incontinent after the denunciation, sal tine the benefite of his liferent, of quhatsumever his landes, offices or commodities, as in the saids actes and statutes thereupon, at mair length is conteined; quhilk last act was also temporall, to indure for the space of seven zeires: And now it being knawen to his Hienesse, and the said Estaites, how necessar the samine is, to be always observed and keeped in continual observance, as ane universal law in all time cumming, for repressing of the saids invasiones; therefore his Hienesse, with advise of the estaites, and haill body of this present Parliament, ratifies, apprievis, and affirmis baith the saids first and second actes, with the haill poyntes, articles, and conditiones conteined thereintill, and ordainis the same to stand as ane perpetuall law in all time cumming.

Acts of Parliament, v. 1. p. 703.

Balfour Fowler
v.
John Gillespie

Date: 20 February 1789
Case No. No 15.

Found in conformity with the above.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

During the dependence of a process of declarator of property, at the instance of Fowler against Gillespie, the latter, in an accidental rencounter with the former, gave him a stroke with a potatoe-hoe, by which he was slightly hurt.

On this circumstance Gillespie instituted an action for having it found, in terms of the statute 1594, cap. 219. “that without farther probation, decree in his favour should be pronounced in the depending process of declarator.” It was

Pleaded for the defender: At the æra of the enactment in question, the state of this country was extremely different from what it is at present; insomuch that the legislature, from necessity, appears to have had recourse to so extraordinary a remedy. The violence of it was thought to be justified by the magnitude of the evil; for “the manifold oppression done within the realm between parties contending in justice, by proud and undaunted oppressors,” as the preamble of the act, bears, forced the legislature to adopt a method of Cure, that, without any exertion of the executive power, which was weak, might operate forcibly, though not very equitably or justly. But, in modern times, when the evil has ceased, and manners are totally altered, to preserve in force such an undistinguishing penal law, would be much the same as to continue the severe regulations, made in the time of a plague, after the distemper had subsided, and the country was restored to its usual health.

Accordingly this penal statute has been so little heard of in later times, that it is not without reason it has been made a question, whether it had not entirely gone into desuetude. The occasions have been few where it could have been insisted on in the present mild state of manners; and, if any did occur, men of spirit would despise, and men of integrity would scruple, to take such an advantage of their neighbour.

The statute is exceptionable in another view; since, comprehensive and unlimited as its terms are, it cannot, without absurdity, be extended indiscriminately to causes of every kind. For example; in the case of a declarator of marriage, it is impossible that a battery, committed by the defender on the pursuer, should at once make them married persons, however clear it might be that no marriage had existed.

Answered, Of the import of the statute of 1594, or of those preceding similar enactments which it ratified, there can be no doubt;. Nor is it less certain that those laws are still in observance, as was determined in the case of Gordon contra Gordon, (No 14. supra,) and in some, other late instances; so that all inquiry, with respect to the original causes of their institution, is precluded.

The Lord Ordinary reported the cause; and

“The Lords found the battery pendente lite by the defender John Gillespie sufficiently instructed; and therefore, agreeably to the declarator, at the instance of the pursuer Balfour Fowler, found he had good and, undoubted right to the property of seven eleventh-parts of the lands of Todsgreen,” &c.

A reclaiming petition against this judgment, though appointed to be answered, was afterwards refused.

Reporter, Lord Eskgrove. Act. G. Fergusson. Alt. M. Ross, M'Cormick. Clerk, Home. Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 70. Fac. Col. No 63. p. 114.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1789/Mor0401378-015.html