![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
Special Immigrations Appeals Commission |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Special Immigrations Appeals Commission >> Y & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKSIAC 41/2005 (16 December 2005) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/SIAC/2005/41_2005.html Cite as: [2005] UKSIAC 41/2005 |
[New search]
[Context]
[Printable version]
[Help]
Y & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKSIAC 41/2005 (16 December 2005)
THE PRESIDENT:
'Y'
'X'
'AA'
'Z'
'W'
'V'
'CC'
What has been of greater concern in this case is whether there is a risk to national security on the basis that he does not abscond. The question is whether conditions can adequately control this and whether, while detention is lawful as it is, it is best that it be controlled by detention. We have not found this straightforward and the basis of our concerns is to be found largely in the closed material. But we have in the end concluded that bail should be granted, but it is being granted on stricter terms than would be necessary simply to prevent absconding. The surety proffered will be necessary.
REVIEW OF DECISIONS MADE ON 20TH OCTOBER 2005
'P'
'K'
'I'
'Q'
'H','G','A'