![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Crantrave Ltd v Lloyds Bank Plc [2000] EWCA Civ 127 (13 April 2000) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2000/127.html Cite as: [2000] Lloyd's Rep Bank 181, [2001] BPIR 57, [2000] 2 All ER (Comm) 89, [2000] QB 917, [2000] CLC 1194, [2000] 3 WLR 877, [2000] 4 All ER 473, [2000] EWCA Civ 127 |
[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable RTF version] [Buy ICLR report: [2000] QB 917] [Help]
CASE NO: CCRTI 1999/0765/B1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE MAYORS AND
CITY OF LONDON COURT
(HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMPSON)
ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE
STRND, LONDON WC2A 2LL
Thursday 13 APRIL 2000
In another case, it might be possible to establish that the customer ratified the gratuitous payment either expressly or by taking advantage of it; or there might conceivably be circumstances not amounting to ratification in which it would nevertheless be unconscionable to allow the customer to recover from the bank the balance of his account without deduction of a payment which the bank had made gratuitously. But I agree with Pill LJ that no such circumstances were established in this case.