![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Hale v Norfolk County Council [2000] EWCA Civ 290 (17 November 2000) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2000/290.html Cite as: [2001] Ch 717, [2001] RTR 26, [2000] EWCA Civ 290, [2001] 2 WLR 1481, [2000] EG 137, [2001] JPL 1093 |
[New search]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable RTF version]
[Buy ICLR report: [2001] Ch 717]
[Help]
Case No: CCRTF 1999/0973/B3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM HIS HONOUR JUDGE LANGAN QC
NORWICH COUNTY COURT
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Friday 17 November 2000
MRS MARGERY HALE |
Appellant | |
- and - |
||
NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL |
Respondent |
1. This is an appeal against an order made on 3 September 1998 by His Honour
Judge Langan QC in the Norwich County Court in proceedings brought by the
appellant, Mrs Margery Hale, against the Norfolk County Council. Permission to
appeal was granted by this Court (Lord Justice Roch and Mr Justice Wilson) on
30 July 1999.
2. Mrs Hale is the owner of property known as "Hviskende Traer" at Tivetshall
St Margaret in Norfolk. The property fronts onto a roadway, known as Green
Lane, in respect of which the respondent Council is the local highway
authority. Mrs Hale occupies a detached single storey dwellinghouse on the
property. The house, which was built in or about 1968, stands some way back
from the roadway, in its own garden. The dispute between Mrs Hale and the
Council concerns that part of her garden, to a depth of 30 feet 6 inches or
thereabouts at its widest point, which is immediately next to the made up
carriageway over Green Lane. That part of the garden is shown coloured blue on
the plan annexed to the particulars of claim and it is convenient to refer to
it as "the blue land".
3. It is common ground that the blue land is in the ownership of Mrs Hale. The
dispute is whether, as the Council contends, the blue land has been dedicated
for use as part of the public highway. The dispute came to a head in April
1992, when Mrs Hale erected several low posts and a chain along the boundary
where the blue land meets the carriageway. The Council served a notice under
section 143 of the Highways Act 1980 requiring her to remove the posts and
chain; and, upon her failing to do so, did so itself. That led to the present
proceedings, in which Mrs Hale claimed a declaration that the blue land does
not form part of the highway, an order requiring the Council to replace the
posts and chain and some boundary stones (which, also, she had placed on the
blue land) and an injunction restraining the Council from entering upon the
blue land. The Council counterclaimed for a declaration that the blue land (or,
in the alternative, so much of the blue land as lay within 36 feet of the
opposite, or far, edge of the carriageway) does form part of the public highway
and for an injunction restraining Mrs Hale from obstructing the blue land (or
such part of it as might be part of the highway) by erecting posts or placing
boundary stones upon it.
4. The action was tried by His Honour Judge Langan QC on 2 and 3 September
1998. Mrs Hale conducted her case in person. At the conclusion of the argument
the judge gave judgment against her. He observed that she seemed to be under a
serious misapprehension as to her rights in law and as to what it was that the
Council were seeking to establish. He dismissed her claims; he declared that
the whole of the blue land formed part of the public highway; he awarded the
Council damages in the sum of £112.82, to reflect the cost of removing the
posts and chain; and he ordered Mrs Hale to pay the Council's costs on scale 2.
Mrs Hale appeals against the whole of that order.
5. The Council's claim to highway rights over the blue land is founded on an
alleged act of dedication by Mrs Hale's predecessor in title, Mr Arthur Wright,
at or about the time that he built the dwellinghouse in which Mrs Hale now
resides. Mr Wright conveyed the property to Mrs Hale and her late husband, Mr
Sidney Hale, in 1970. It is not suggested that anything done by Mr or Mrs Hale
in relation to the blue land could amount to the dedication of that land for
use as part of the public highway.
6. It is necessary to examine, in some detail, the circumstances in which Mr
Wright acquired the property now known as "Hviskende Traer". The property was
conveyed to him as a building plot by the Depwade Rural District Council under
a conveyance dated 3 July 1968. The building plot (Plot 2) was identified by
measurement and by reference to a plan annexed to the conveyance. The
conveyance plan is itself derived from an earlier plan ("the 1967 plan") which
appears on its face to have been prepared in April 1967 by the Engineer and
Surveyor's Department of the District Council. Plot 2 is one of three plots
shown on the plan; the three plots having together an area of 0.625 acres or
thereabouts and being part of OS No.295. The area of the three plots is shown
to be enclosed on the north and east sides by a barbed wire stock fence. The
western boundary, which is shown to be unfenced, abuts the Green Lane
carriageway. The land to the south of the three plots had already been
developed by the erection of local authority housing. The local authority
housing development is set back from the Green Lane by a service road in the
form of a crescent. The service road lies to the east of the Green Lane and
gives access to it. The south western corner of the area comprising the three
plots shown on the 1967 land is formed by the northern end of the service road
at the point where the crescent meets the Green Lane carriageway.
7. The 1967 plan identifies the three plots by measurement. Plot 3 comprises
the eastern portion of the area to be sold off. Plot 1 comprises the north
western portion. Plot 2 (which was to be acquired by Mr Wright) occupies most
of the south western portion; but is separated from the southern boundary
(where the land to be sold off abuts the local authority housing development)
by a 15 foot strip which gives access from the service road to Plot 3. The plan
shows the plots separated by a "post and wire fence 3'0" high", depicted as a
broken line. It is, however, unclear whether, at the time when the 1967 plan
was prepared or at the date of the conveyance of Plot 2 to Mr Wright (July
1968), the inter-plot boundaries were in fact defined by fences or other
physical features on the ground. Paragraph 3 in the schedule to the 1968
conveyance required the purchaser, before commencing to build on the plot, to
erect a three strand post and wire fence on the southern and eastern boundaries
of the land conveyed. It is reasonable to assume, in the context of a sale-off
of building plots evidenced by the 1967 plan, that the conveyances to the
purchasers of Plots 1 and 3 will have contained similar fencing covenants; so
that the inter-plot boundaries which were defined by measurement at the time of
the sales would become defined on the ground as the result of fences to be
erected by the respective purchasers. The only contrary indications are
contained in material which was not, strictly, in evidence before the judge.
Mrs Hale argued, in her closing submissions at trial, that the fences had been
put up by "Edwards" for the District Council before the plots were sold off.
She produced a document containing copies of extracts from the minutes of
Depwade Rural District Council held in the Norfolk Public Records Office. The
minutes record, on 17 October 1966: "Construction A provision of entrances,
fencing to building plots at Tivetshall St Margaret. Edwards J Edwards
Norwich". They record, also, on 14 November 1966: "Sale of Building Plots
Committee Minutes no 7110(A)".
8. The 1967 plan includes two features which are of particular importance in
the context of the present dispute. First, it shows, hatched, a strip 20 feet
in depth along the length of the western boundary and immediately to the east
of the Green Lane carriageway. That strip ("the hatched strip") is described on
the 1967 plan as "claimed by N.C.C. for future c./w. improvements". The hatched
strip extends along the whole of the western boundary of Plot 1; and extends
along so much of the western boundary of Plot 2 as abuts the Green Lane
carriageway - that is to say, along the western boundary of Plot 2 to the point
where that boundary is formed by the service road. Second, the 1967 plan shows
a further broken line extending from the northern boundary of Plot 1 to the
southern boundary of Plot 2, orientated more or less north to south and set
back some 30 feet or more from so much of the western boundary of those two
plots as abuts the Green Lane carriageway. The position of that line (to which,
for convenience, I shall refer as "the broken line") is identified by detailed
measurement. The measurements show the point at which access to Plot 1 from the
Green Lane carriageway is to be obtained over a driveway (with sight lines);
and the point at which access to Plot 2 is to be obtained from the service
road. The position of the broken line on the 1967 plan is such that it is
aligned with (and could be regarded as a continuation of) the line of a hedge
which is shown on the eastern side of that part of the service road which is in
front of the local authority housing development. Again, it is unclear whether,
at the time when the 1967 plan was prepared, that broken line was defined by
any physical feature on the ground. If the plots themselves were not so
defined, it is difficult to think why there should be anything in place on a
line in that position. It is difficult to think of any reason why, before
building had commenced on the area of land to be sold off, there should be a
fence or hedge in that position; and identification of the position of the
broken line by detailed measurement would have been unnecessary if there had
been a physical feature on the ground, given that this was not to be the
boundary of the land sold off.
9. The blue land is that part of Mrs Hale's property (formerly Plot 2) which
lies between the broken line and the western boundary formed by the Green Lane
carriageway and the service road. The effect of the service road is such that
the shape of the blue land can be likened to that of a saucepan - with the base
formed by the Green Lane carriageway and the top by the broken line, and with
the handle pointing down the line of the service road. Part of the blue land -
to a depth of 20 feet from the Green Lane carriageway - is within the hatched
strip shown on the 1967 plan; the remainder - having a depth of 10 feet or more
- lies between the hatched strip and the broken line.
10. Before acquiring Plot 2 Mr Wright had made an application for the
permission to carry out development which he required under the Town and
Country Planning Acts 1962. Permission for the erection of a bungalow and
garage was first granted on 16 October 1967. At or about the same time he was
given notice by Norfolk County Council in form GD 10. The notice was in these
terms: