![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> John Reid & Sons (Strucsteel) Ltd v. Terrence Lester Keeping [2000] UKEAT 1407_99_1112 (11 December 2000) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1407_99_1112.html Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 1407_99_1112 |
[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
At the Tribunal | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE D PUGSLEY
MISS A MACKIE OBE
MRS T A MARSLAND
APPELLANT | |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
Revised
For the Appellant | MR P MOONEY Representative Employment Law Advisory Services Ltd Lancaster House Old Wellington Road Manchester M30 9QG |
For the Respondent | MR R MILES Solicitor Messrs Moore & Blatch Solicitors 11 The Avenue Southampton SO17 1XF |
JUDGE D PUGSLEY
"An appeal should not be allowed on this ground simply because the Employment Appeal Tribunal disagrees with the Industrial Tribunals as to the justice of the result, the merits of the case or the interpretation of the facts. This Tribunal shall only interfere with the decision of the Industrial Tribunal where the conclusion of that Tribunal on the evidence before it is "irrational", "offends reason", "is certainly wrong" or is "very clearly wrong" or "must be wrong" or "is plainly wrong" or is not "a permissible option" or "is fundamentally wrong" or "is outrageous" or "makes absolutely no sense" or "flies in the face of properly informed logic".
"It would be a thousand pities if reasons began to be subject to a detailed analysis and appeals report based upon such analysis".