![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Ballamoody v. Nursing & Midwifery Council [2003] UKEAT 0079_03_0406 (4 June 2003) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2003/0079_03_0406.html Cite as: [2003] UKEAT 0079_03_0406, [2003] UKEAT 79_3_406 |
[New search]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
At the Tribunal | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK
MS K BILGAN
MR I EZEKIEL
APPELLANT | |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING
For the Appellant | MR R BALLAMOODY (the Appellant in Person) |
HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK
2 "Members of the Tribunal were unclear about the principle of hypothetical comparator. The Tribunal has not drawn proper inference in its application to my case. (see case Chief of West Yorkshire Police v Vento [2001 IRLR 124 EAT]." [the judgment of Lindsay P on constructing the hypothetical comparator].