![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Law v Pace Micro Technology Plc [2003] UKEAT 1020_02_2907 (29 July 2003) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2003/1020_02_2907.html Cite as: [2003] UKEAT 1020_02_2907, [2003] UKEAT 1020_2_2907 |
[New search] [View without highlighting] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
At the Tribunal | |
On 7 May 2003 | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE PROPHET
MR K EDMONDSON JP
MR G LEWIS
APPELLANT | |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
Revised
For the Appellant | MS TESS GILL (of Counsel) Instructed by: Disability Rights Commission 2nd Floor Arndale House The Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ |
For the Respondent | MR MARK SHRIVES Solicitor Messrs Hammond Suddards Edge Solicitors 2 Park Lane Leeds LS3 1ES |
HIS HONOUR JUDGE PROPHET
"that by offering him work as a Health and Safety Officer only on the condition that the work was done on a full time basis, that put him at a substantial disadvantage in comparison with a person who was not disabled, and who would therefore have been able to work full-time."
The step which the Employment Tribunal then found it would have been reasonable for the employers to have taken was to have offered him that post on a part-time basis, at least for a trial period.