![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions >> Breitenbach & Ors v Canaccord Genuity Financial Planning Ltd [2020] EWHC 1354 (Ch) (18 May 2020) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2020/1354.html Cite as: [2020] EWHC 1354 (Ch) |
[New search]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable PDF version]
[Help]
BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES
BUSINESS LIST (ChD)
7 Rolls Buildings Fetter Lane, London EC4A 1NL |
||
B e f o r e :
and
Master Kaye
____________________
Peter Breitenbach and others |
Claimants |
|
- and - |
||
Canaccord Genuity Financial Planning Limited |
Defendant |
____________________
Jonathan Nash QC (instructed by Stewarts Law) for the Claimants
Jamie Smith QC and Shail Patel (instructed by Macfarlanes) for the Defendant
Hearing date: 18th May 2020
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Mr Justice Fancourt and Master Kaye:
MR JUSTICE FANCOURT:
a. First, how different are the material facts in the Claremont claims from the Invicta 43 claims? In other words, how much will a decision on the section 14A issue in the Claremont claims add to a decision that is only persuasive and not binding.b. Second, how different are the individual facts within the Claremont claims; that is to say, how many additional claimants will be needed in order to create a valuable and persuasive decision on the section 14A issue in the Claremont claim.
c. Third, how beneficial is a decision on the section 14A issue in the Claremont claims likely to be; and
d. Fourth, what is the impact in terms of additional cost and time likely to be.