![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions >> Davies v O'Keeffe & Ors (Re Greenfrost Ltd & PMO Property Ltd) [2023] EWHC 5 (Ch) (06 January 2023) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2023/5.html Cite as: [2023] EWHC 5 (Ch) |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS IN WALES
CARDIFF DISTRICT REGISTRY
INSOLVENCY AND COMPANIES LIST (ChD)
In the matters of:
Greenfrost Limited
PMO Property Limited
and the Companies Act 2006
2 Park Street, Cardiff, CF11 |
||
B e f o r e :
Sitting as a judge of the High Court
____________________
AMANDA ANN DAVIES |
Petitioner |
|
- and - |
||
(1) PATRICK MICHAEL O'KEEFFE (2) GREENFROST LIMITED (3) PMO PROPERTY LIMITED |
Respondents |
____________________
Mr Gwydion Hughes (instructed by Peter Llyn and Partners) for the first defendant
Hearing dates: 13-15 December 2022
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
HH JUDGE JARMAN KC:
Introduction
Background
Legal principles
"A member of a company may apply to the court by petition for an order under this Part on the ground-
(a) that the company's affairs are being or have been conducted in a member that is unfairly prejudicial to the interest of member generally or of some part of its members (including at least himself), or
(b) that an actual or proposed act or omission of the company (including an act or omission on its behalf) is or would be so prejudicial."
The witnesses
Exclusion
Misuse of assets
Unfairly prejudicial conduct
Relief
Conclusion