![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions >> Stratford Coin & Bullion Inc v Henien & Ors [2011] EWHC 2552 (Comm) (10 October 2011) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2011/2552.html Cite as: [2011] EWHC 2552 (Comm) |
[New search]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
COMMERCIAL COURT
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Claimant |
|
- and - |
||
(1) Youssry Henien (2) Harry Henien (3) Leman Wealth Management SA (4) London Zurich International Ltd |
Defendants |
____________________
Michael Fealy (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) for the Defendants
Hearing date: 15 September 2011
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Mr Justice Beatson:
I. Introduction
II. The factual background and the claims
(a) The claimant's primary case against the first and second defendants
(b) The claimant's alternative case against the first and second defendants
III The applications for summary judgment against the third and fourth defendants
IV A conditional order pursuant to CPR 24.6(b)
(a) A defendant must frankly disclose not just his own assets, but his ability to raise funds from friends, relatives, and business associates: see Yorke Motors v Edwards [1982] 1 WLR 444, 449 per Lord Diplock.
(b) The burden is upon a defendant to show he cannot make the proposed payment by evidence that it can place clearly before the court: Agrichem v Hammond-Suddarts [2002] EWCA Civ 335 at [9].