![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions >> UMS Holding Ltd & Ors v Great Station Properties SA & Anor [2017] EWHC 2473 (Comm) (06 October 2017) URL: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2017/2473.html Cite as: [2017] EWHC 2473 (Comm), [2017] 2 Lloyd's Rep 448 |
[New search]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
COMMERCIAL COURT
Rolls Building, 7 Rolls Buildings Fetter Lane, London EC4A 1NL |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
(1) UMS HOLDING LIMITED (2) ENERGY STANDARD FUND LIMITED (3) ENERGY STANDARD INDUSTRIES LIMITED -and- (1) GREAT STATION PROPERTIES S.A. (2) INTER GROWTH INVESTMENTS LIMITED -and- STREMVOL HOLDINGS LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: (1) GREAT STATION PROPERTIES S.A. (2) INTER GROWTH INVESTMENTS LIMITED |
Claimants Defendants Respondent Arbitration Claimants |
|
- and - |
||
(1) UMS HOLDING LIMITED (2) ENERGY STANDARD FUND LIMITED (3) ENERGY STANDARD INDUSTRIES LIMITED (4) STREMVOL HOLDINGS LIMITED |
Arbitration Respondents |
____________________
Daniel Jowell QC and Richard Eschwege (instructed by Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP) for the Defendants/Arbitration Claimants
Hearing date: 5 October 2017
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Mr. Justice Teare :
Permission to appeal
Interim payment on account of costs
Confidentiality of the Award
"as a general principle to keep confidential all awards in the arbitration, together with all materials in the arbitration created for the purpose of the arbitration and all other documents produced by another party in the proceedings not otherwise in the public domain, save and to the extent that disclosure may be required of a party by legal duty, to protect or pursue a legal right, or to enforce or challenge an award in legal proceedings before a state court or other legal authority."
"any document that a party is obliged to keep confidential pursuant to Article 30.1 of the LCIA Rules 1998, including for the avoidance of doubt the arbitration award out of which these proceedings arise, may not be used by that party for any purpose other than these proceedings, or disclosed to any third party, solely on the basis that the document has been read to or by the court, or referred to, in the course of the Hearing."