![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] [DONATE] | |||||||||
First-tier Tribunal (Tax) |
||||||||||
PLEASE SUPPORT BAILII & FREE ACCESS TO LAW
To maintain its current level of service, BAILII urgently needs the support of its users.
Since you use the site, please consider making a donation to celebrate BAILII's 25 years of providing free access to law. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing this vital service.
Thank you for your support! | ||||||||||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Tax) >> ULSTER METALS v Revenue & Customs (COSTS - Case allocated to complex category) [2022] UKFTT 125 (TC) (07 April 2022) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2022/TC08456.html Cite as: [2022] UKFTT 125 (TC) |
[New search]
[Contents list]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable PDF version]
[Help]
Decision Number: | TC 08456 |
Appellant: | ULSTER METALS |
Respondent: | Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs |
Chairmen / Special Commissioners: |
Dr Christopher ![]() |
Date Of Decision: | 07/04/2022 |
Main Category: | PROCEDURE |
Main Subcategory: | Other |
Notes: | COSTS - Case allocated to complex category Costs of an interlocutory application - Costs awarded to HMRC on the basis of Rule 10(1)(c), but, if not, would have been awarded on the basis of unreasonable conduct (being a materially misleading witness statement, subsequently found to be untrue) under Rule 10(1)(b). Costs of a substantive hearing - Each party successful in part - Appeal allowed in relation to Revenue's failure to establish connection to fraud for one set of deals - Appeal dismissed in relation to other sets of deals, where the Appellant was found to have had actual knowledge of connection to fraud - No order as to costs. |