If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Supreme Court |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Supreme Court >> Marley v. Rawlings & Anor (Rev 2) [2014] UKSC 51 (18 September 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2014/51.html Cite as: [2014] 5 Costs LR 905, [2014] 3 WLR 1015, [2014] WLR(D) 402, [2015] 1 AC 157, [2014] UKSC 51, [2014] WTLR 1511, [2014] Fam Law 1682, [2014] 4 All ER 619, [2015] AC 157 |
[New search]
[Context]
[View without highlighting]
[Printable PDF version]
[View ICLR summary: [2014] WLR(D) 402]
[Buy ICLR report: [2015] 1 AC 157]
[Buy ICLR report: [2014] 3 WLR 1015]
[Help]
Trinity Term
[2014] UKSC 51
On appeal from: [2012] EWCA Civ 61
JUDGMENT
Marley
(Appellant)
v
![]()
Rawlings
and another (Respondents) (
Costs)
![]()
Lord Neuberger
Lord Clarke
Lord Sumption
Lord Carnwath
Lord Hodge
JUDGMENT GIVEN ON
18th September 2014
Heard on 3 December 2013
Appellant Robert Ham QC Teresa Rosen Peacocke (Instructed by Hugh Cartwright & Amin) |
Respondents Nicholas Le Poidevin QC Alexander Learmonth (Instructed by Gillan & Co) |
See also: [2014] UKSC 2
LORD NEUBERGER (WITH WHOM LORDS CLARKE, SUMPTION, CARNWATH AND HODGE AGREED):
Introductory
The position disregarding the CFAs
The effect of the CFAs in the Supreme Court
Conclusion