BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions >> Ladyga v Prosecutor Generals Office Lithuania [2012] EWHC 2807 (Admin) (19 July 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/2807.html
Cite as: [2012] EWHC 2807 (Admin)

[New search] [Context] [View without highlighting] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 2807 (Admin)
Case No. CO/10065/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2A 2LL
19 July 2012

B e f o r e :

MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS
____________________

Between:
LADYGA Appellant
v
PROSECUTOR GENERALS OFFICE LITHUANIA Respondent

____________________

Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of
WordWave International Limited
A Merrill Communications Company
165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7404 1424
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

The Appellant appeared in person
Ms H Pye (instructed by Crown Prosecution Service Extradition) appeared on behalf of the Respondent

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: This case, as has been explained to me, has something of a protracted history. All matters outstanding in the appeal were decided by Collins J on 7 February 2012 when he dealt with human rights aspect under Article 8 and Article 3 raised by the appellant.
  2. However, as the arrest warrant in the case had been issued by a prosecutor and as the decision of the Supreme Court in Assange had not yet been handed down, there was an outstanding issue as to whether the prosecutor was an appropriate judicial authority to issue the warrant.
  3. That matter having now been decided by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court having decided that the prosecutor is an appropriate judicial authority, that ground of appeal must also be dismissed, which effectively disposes of the appeal.
  4. MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: Thank you, Ms Pye.
  5. MS PYE: Thank you, my Lord.
  6. MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: I am so sorry. What do you want to say?
  7. THE APPELLANT: Do I have 17 days before I am extradited?
  8. MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: How long does he have?
  9. MS PYE: My Lord, the usual course is there are 14 days in which an application to certify a point of public importance can be made. Once those 14 days expire, then the 10 days in which this gentleman should be removed start to run. So 14 to 24 days.
  10. MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: Okay. Thank you. I am glad you all have these things at your fingertips, doing these things every day.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/2807.html